The second claim on which Feminists for Life (FFL) bases its pro-life feminist position is that in the 1960s, men—one man in particular—convinced feminists—one feminist in particular—to be pro-abortion and join the campaign to repeal abortion laws in the U.S. Continue reading
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Feminists for Life (FFL) holds up Susan B. Anthony as its main foremother; the intellectual force behind the early feminist movement in the U.S., Elizabeth Cady Stanton, is also corralled into FFL’s revisionist history.
Elizabeth Cady Stanton also spoke about abortion. FFL initially used a statement that was supposedly made by Stanton in a letter written to Julia Ward Howe in 1873 which FFL claimed to have been recorded in Howe’s diary for the entry of October 16th: “When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit.” Continue reading
Some call pro-life feminism an oxymoron. Others say pro-life feminism is true feminism. It is espoused by the U.S. organization Feminists for Life (FFL), and has become popular in the pro-life movement. The idea of pro-life feminism has led to books such as Abortion, The Ultimate Exploitation of Women (2014), by Brian Fisher of the pro-life organization Human Coalition. More recently, a book titled, Subverted, How I Helped the Sexual Revolution Hijack the Women’s Movement (2015), by Sue Ellen Browder, promotes similar ideas.
Pro-life feminists base their position that feminism is or can be pro-life on two main claims regarding the history of abortion in the U.S.—one from the first wave of feminism in the 19th century and one from the second wave of feminism in the 20th century. Continue reading
My husband Fred says a woman’s place is in the house—the U.S. House of Representatives. —Phyllis Schlafly
Phyllis Schlafly, who died a few days ago at the age of 92, is known as a heroine of grassroots conservatism and anti-feminism. She famously helped defeat the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) in the 1970s and she was an outspoken critic of second wave feminism. However, a look at a few aspects of her life and career reveals that she is a flimsy example of such heroism.
First, Schlafly, like so many feminist-oriented women, handed over her responsibilities as a housewife to professionals, which her husband’s wealth allowed her to do. While Schlafly claimed that woman’s most important job is to be a wife and mother, she herself rejected the role of housewife to become a political activist. When her children were still young, she embarked on a busy schedule of speaking engagements, writing projects and activism. Continue reading
In January 1915, Miss Henrietta Rodman, President of the recently-formed Feminist Alliance, was interviewed by the New York Times about her idea for a “feminist apartment house.” The article begins with the line: “the care of the baby is the weak point in feminism.” Continue reading
One of the accusations traditional-minded, conservative types make against feminists is that feminists hate men. From my experience both in reading about feminism and in observing the feminists around us, I don’t find this accusation to be well-founded. At the very least, the accusation is an oversimplification of the ideology and attitude of feminists. Continue reading
This incendiary title needs some quick explaining.
What I mean when I say “women shouldn’t work” is that women shouldn’t work in the same capacity as men, or to be more specific, women shouldn’t be breadwinners. In extraordinary circumstances such as poverty or war women may be called upon to work in the same capacity as men, but in the normal course of life women should not work as men do.
It is usually not true economic need but feminist ideology—that to be fulfilled a woman must have a career—that drives women to the work world. Some women aren’t even aware of the ideology, they blindly follow what feminism has set as the norm for the modern woman—that she has her own pay cheque and can support herself. Continue reading
On the woman question, Pope Francis seems to follow in the footsteps of St. John Paul II, but at some times ignores the work of his predecessor and at other times shows a greater adherence to feminist ideology. Continue reading
St. John Paul II’s apostolic letter on the dignity and vocation of women, Mulieris Dignitatem, was released in 1988. It is interesting to note John Paul II’s comments in Mulieris Dignitatem on Ephesians 5:22-23 as compared to previous popes. Continue reading
While St. John Paul II wasn’t the first pope to condone feminism and attempt to reconcile it with Church teaching, he is the pope who made “Catholic feminism” possible. He became known as the “feminist pope” after he referred to himself as such during an audience with a group of women at a conference on women’s health and human rights at the Vatican. While St. John XXIII and Paul VI had already begun to condone feminism and reconcile it with Church teaching, St. John Paul II was the architect of the “new feminism” or “Catholic feminism.” “Catholic feminism,” to all who understand feminist ideology and have knowledge of its effects, is a contradictory term. St. John Paul II didn’t use this term—his call was for a “new feminism.” For some Catholic women however, this new feminism was in effect Catholic feminism, and, the license to live their lives as both a Catholic and a feminist. I wrote extensively on Why Catholics Can’t be Feminists in a previous post so I won’t repeat myself here. Continue reading